This is a teacher speaking, an agriculturist, UP '65 (BSA Ag Edu), a Civil Service Professional (80.6%), wide reader, natural-born thinker and self-taught creative writer – I pity grade schoolers, high schoolers and college students who are forced to learn by rote, to memorize without understanding. Happened to me!
“Teaching-Learning” image from Timeshighereducation.com)
I am a farmer’s son; naturally, my favorite people are the
farmers, male. Today, how do we teach farmers? Mostly by telling them who, what,
where, when, why, how, and how long. We expect them to simply listen and obey.
They are half-empty vessels of existence that must be filled up with knowledge.
I am reading a Facebook post by my alma mater UP Los BaƱos: “ILC
Is Now The Center For The Advancement Of Teaching And Learning” (13 Jan 2022, UPLB.edu.ph),
that which says:
UP President Danilo L
Concepcion approved the proposal of UPLB to pilot the expansion of the mandate
of the Interactive Learning Center (ILC) through its reorganization into the
Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning (CATL). This was after the
UP President’s Advisory Council (PAC) endorsed for President Concepcion’s
approval… the “Pilot Expansion of the Mandate of the UPLB ILC and its
Reorganization as the CATL, consolidating the Functions of Various UPLB
Committees to Improve Teaching and Learning.” President Concepcion approved
this endorsement on 03 Dec 2021.
Googling, this is the first time I learn that UP Diliman
itself has an ILC. Now then, from a clear single mandate of “interactive
learning” to a double mandate of “teaching and learning” – the UP System has in
effect and in fact reinvented education into 2 separate activities:
Teaching
on the part of the teacher and
Learning on the part of the student –
2 distinct, separate activities.
With the UPLB ILC becoming the CATL, the UP System has reinvented education.
This teacher now ask: Is that good or bad for the Philippine Educational System?
After all, UP is the National University System.
As a mere citizen, I cannot disapprove of this seemingly-simple-but-actually-complicated
educational move by my alma mater UP, but I do not approve of it either! To separate the teaching from the learning
is to separate the teacher from the learner, no ifs and buts.
As a UP-taught teacher and a self-taught creative thinker, I
have come to realize that, as the title of my essay puts it, “The Trouble With
Teachers Is That The Learners Know Better!” The teachers teach by rote;
the learners learn by understanding – and the teachers have never
learned from the learners how to teach!
“Advancement Of Teaching And Learning.” UP wants to advance
the use of digital tools in teaching, which is good, but UP is separating the
use of digital tools in learning, which is bad!
UP Diliman: Above, the superimposed
image I got from the ILC Diliman Facebook post is “Inc” as it is, but the words
are clear about what they are trying to display: “Upgrade to Interactive.”
UPLB: “Forget Interactive.”
FAH: “What is the UP System trying
to prove!?”@517
No comments:
Post a Comment